Larry Pozner, a former president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, called the prosecution's moves "a series of Hail Mary passes."
"The prosecution is crying, `It's the judge, it's the clerk, it's the media, it's the defense,' and the one thing they don't talk about is it's the facts," Pozner said. "This isn't particularly about getting out-lawyered. The prosecution ran out of good facts before the defense ran out of good facts."
The accuser's attorneys last week questioned whether she could get a fair hearing because of court mistakes, and said her best chance to air her side of the story could be in civil court. The woman's name was mistakenly included in filings posted on a state court Web site even before the court reporter's accidental e-mail to the media.
Look, having sex with some one before ( allegedly) and after ( allegedly) your rape (allegedly) *DOES* make your actions look suspicious
I have yet to meet a rape victim who would have sex after a rape
the guy from the Defense attorney's group has it right.. the state just had a horrible case to make
No comments:
Post a Comment