Thursday, March 03, 2005

Because Clearly this worked well in NK

from Al-Reuters


By Steve Holland

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush was leaning on Thursday toward backing Europe in offering incentives to Iran to persuade it to give up nuclear ambitions, U.S. officials said, in a significant shift in strategy toward an arch enemy. .....

We're continuing to look at how we can best support the European efforts, and make sure that those efforts are successful, to get Iran to abandon its nuclear ambitions," he said.

U.S. officials said under the new strategy, the United States would not block Iran as it seeks to start the process of joining the World Trade Organization, and would not stand in the way of European allies if they want to sell Tehran parts for civilian aircraft. .....

Some U.S. officials believe offering incentives will strengthen the international community's hand by providing a united front for punitive measures, such as U.N. sanctions, if the incentives do not work.

Supporting Europe on the incentives would mark a significant shift in strategy for Bush, who has been reluctant to consider them before to avoid being seen as rewarding Iran for bad behavior. ....

It can take years of negotiations for a country to enter the WTO. As a first step Iran could be granted observer status, a stepping stone to full accession.

Countries granted observer status must begin the process of moving toward full membership within five years. Actual entry into the WTO can take years beyond that, and the United States could still hold up those talks indefinitely.


Ok George lets review

we gave North Korea new nuclear reactors

gave them food and cash

gave them fuel oil

they continued to develop nukes

we said to Libya "if your good we'll get sanctions off you" Libya abanonded their program and was rewarded

Option A failed
Option B passed

so why george are you running the A play on Iran?

why are you considering allowing the EU to sell parts that can be converted to military use?

what foggy mind at foggy bottom convinced you of this idiocy?

No comments: