More Proof in the Pudding

Bush and Cheney laid low during the Democratic convention because ( logically) they realized they would be thowing money into the wind by running ads and making major campaign stops during the democratic convention.

Now i look at these stops Kerry is making, other then the American Legion ( and only because of his war issues) none of them have gotten real coverage, most slightly less then the "truth squad" being run at the convention.

Not only is this not as class a campaign as Bush is running i have to ask, what the heck is Kerry thinking?

Kerry's commitment to defend this country is being questioned because

In the 80s and the 90s he took a lead in cutting back the defense and intelligence sectors.
in the 70s as a protestor he wanted to put the US army under UN command and scatter it about the world

his use of bogus testimony ( from the Winter Soldier hearings) to slander vets, stuff that was proven bogus in the 70s

his blocking attempts to punish the Vietnamesse communist government in the senate TODAY for their human rights abuses.

His making positive comments about FARC

his visiting the sandanista regime during the height of the Iran COntra issue

the fact he has never pushed for major aid to the vets in this country

the fact to many people he is viewed as white washing on the POW-MIA issue

and i can go on

as Lt. Governor of Massachucetts he authored an executive order to refuse to take any preperations for civil defense in the case of a Nuclear attack

the public meetings he missed of the intelligence committee, worse missing them after a major intelligence snafu ( the bombing of the first world trade center)

"I'm not going to have my commitment to defend this country questioned by those who refused to serve when they could have and by those who have misled the nation into Iraq,"

So

#1) because you got shot at and such in Vietnam they can't question you on Foriegn and Military policy?
#2) YOU tried to get a deferment John and it failed
and
#3) when asked "Knowing then what you know now, would you still vote to use force" and you said yes. How can George Bush be misleading you if even today knowing the "facts" you would still do the same thing?

John as a Member of the US senate you did some things that puts your ability to defend this nation in the times we live in today as questionable

but instead of answering the question your saying because of your wounds of war they cannot be asked.

this is EXACTLLY why i am voting for George Bush

Had John Kerry manned up and been willing to rebut these charges they would go away.

But, John Kerry feels because he slandered our soldiers but was one he is beyond approach

sorry John Boy, it don't work that way